Switch to ADA Accessible Theme
Close Menu
Committed Philadelphia Injury Firm with Proven Trial Results
Get Your Free Consultation 215-372-8889
Philadelphia Med Mal & Birth Injury Lawyer / Blog / Medical Malpractice / Understanding the “Standard of Care” in Medical Malpractice Claims

Understanding the “Standard of Care” in Medical Malpractice Claims

DocPatient

When a patient visits a healthcare provider, there’s an implicit trust that the provider will deliver competent care. Unfortunately, medical errors still occur, leaving patients injured and unsure of their rights. When considering legal action for medical malpractice, one critical concept arises repeatedly: the standard of care. Understanding this concept is crucial for patients and families navigating a potential malpractice claim.

The Philadelphia medical malpractice attorneys at The Villari Firm explain precisely what the standard of care means, how it’s established, and why it’s so critical in medical malpractice cases.

What Is the “Standard of Care”?

The standard of care refers to the level and type of care that a reasonably competent medical professional, practicing in the same specialty and under similar circumstances, would provide. In simpler terms, it’s what an average, prudent doctor or healthcare professional would do when faced with a similar medical scenario.

In medical malpractice cases, courts rely heavily on this standard to assess whether a healthcare provider acted appropriately. If a medical professional’s actions deviate from this established standard, resulting in harm to the patient, it may constitute negligence and provide grounds for a medical malpractice lawsuit.

How Is the Standard of Care Determined?

Determining the standard of care involves several factors and often relies on expert testimony. Here are the primary ways it’s established:

1. Expert Medical Witnesses

Because the standard of care involves medical judgment and expertise, medical malpractice cases typically require testimony from expert witnesses—doctors or healthcare professionals who practice in the same field as the defendant. These experts assess the case based on:

  • Accepted medical practices within the community or field.
  • Established clinical guidelines and protocols.
  • Medical literature, research, and reputable publications.

The expert explains what the accepted practices are and evaluates whether the healthcare provider’s actions deviated significantly from them.

2. Medical Guidelines and Clinical Protocols

Official clinical guidelines published by reputable medical organizations often establish a clear benchmark for the standard of care. Examples include:

  • Guidelines from the American Heart Association for diagnosing and treating heart attacks.
  • The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommendations for childbirth practices.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) infection-control protocols.

When healthcare providers fail to adhere to widely accepted medical guidelines, it strengthens claims of negligence and helps establish a breach in the standard of care.

Why Is the Standard of Care So Important in Malpractice Cases?

The standard of care serves as a critical reference point in medical malpractice lawsuits for several reasons:

Clearly Defines Negligence

Negligence in medical malpractice involves more than just an adverse outcome—it requires proof that the healthcare provider did not act as a similarly trained, reasonable professional would have under similar circumstances. The standard of care clarifies this by setting objective benchmarks for evaluating a provider’s performance.

Establishes Accountability

Healthcare providers are accountable not only to their patients but also to their peers and their profession. Holding providers to a clear standard ensures accountability for negligent or substandard treatment, promoting patient safety and encouraging adherence to best practices.

Protects Patients’ Rights

By clearly defining what acceptable medical care looks like, the standard of care empowers patients and families to identify when something has gone wrong. Patients have the right to receive competent care, and establishing a clear standard of care ensures victims have legal recourse when healthcare providers fail to deliver appropriate treatment.

Examples of Violating the Standard of Care

Understanding how the standard of care applies can be clearer with practical examples:

  • Misdiagnosis or Failure to Diagnose:
    If a patient presents with symptoms of a heart attack, but the doctor dismisses these symptoms without proper testing, this may violate the standard of care for emergency or cardiac medicine.
  • Surgical Errors:
    Leaving surgical tools inside a patient or operating on the wrong body part clearly breaches accepted surgical standards and guidelines.
  • Medication Errors:
    Prescribing medications without considering dangerous drug interactions or allergies violates pharmacological standards of care.
  • Birth Injuries:
    Failing to properly monitor fetal distress during delivery or ignoring signs of complications breaches accepted obstetric standards of care.

In each of these examples, the critical question is: would another reasonably competent healthcare provider have done things differently, potentially avoiding harm?

Challenges in Proving Standard of Care Violations

While establishing the standard of care seems straightforward, medical malpractice cases can be quite challenging:

  • Conflicting Expert Opinions: Defense attorneys often produce their own expert witnesses who argue the provider acted within reasonable bounds, creating uncertainty and complexity for the jury.
  • Complex Medical Evidence: Explaining technical medical details to jurors can be difficult, requiring skilled attorneys and credible expert witnesses.
  • Ambiguity in Guidelines: Medical standards are sometimes broad, and judgment calls may lead to disputes about whether a provider deviated significantly from accepted practices.

Due to these complexities, having experienced medical malpractice attorneys who understand medical issues and know how to present persuasive expert testimony is essential.

How an Experienced Medical Malpractice Attorney Can Help

Medical malpractice claims require detailed knowledge of medical standards, evidence gathering, and strategic litigation. An experienced medical malpractice attorney can:

  • Retain highly qualified medical experts to define and demonstrate violations of the standard of care.
  • Analyze medical records thoroughly to uncover critical evidence of negligence.
  • Clearly present complex medical information to jurors, emphasizing the critical differences between appropriate care and negligent practices.
  • Negotiate effectively with insurance companies and healthcare providers to maximize compensation.

Contact The Villari Firm

Understanding the standard of care is fundamental for anyone considering a medical malpractice claim. By clarifying what acceptable medical practices entail, the standard of care provides the foundation upon which negligence can be clearly identified and addressed. When medical professionals deviate from these standards and cause harm, patients have a right to seek justice and compensation.

If you believe you or a loved one has suffered injury due to medical negligence, the attorneys at The Villari Law Firm can help. We understand the complexities of proving standard-of-care violations and will aggressively advocate for your rights. Contact us today for a free consultation to discuss your potential claim.

Sources:

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3088386

verywellhealth.com/standard-of-care-2615208

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn